Cara NevinEditor, board mechanics and operator documents, since 2026

Three published ceilings, the widest 200 times the narrowest

The clause after the win

A maximum multiplier describes one slot on a board. A withdrawal ceiling describes how fast a balance of any size can leave the account, and it is written in the terms rather than on the game screen. Three of the ten operators here publish one: 1,000,000 USDT a week, 100,000 USD a week and 5,000 USD a month.

Ten operators whose records carry a house-games category, with the fields their own documents and licence registers actually publish. Every figure here is about the account, not about the board: nothing in this data says which games any of them carries, and no cell has been filled in to suggest otherwise. Every empty cell on this table is a list nobody read, and it is never a zero: a blank under coins does not mean an operator takes none, and a blank under countries barred does not mean it bars none.
Operator	Licence	Coins listed	Studios listed	Amount before ID check	Countries barred	Go
Vaveour partner	Curaçao Gaming Authority · OGL/2024/1676/0905 · Active	6	Casino and sportsbook on one balance	Case by case, clause 8.7	Open to this site’s readers	Visit
Vave is the partner of this site, and the one operator here you can look up in a register in under a minute: licence OGL/2024/1676/0905, held by Latcas B.V., issued 19 May 2025 and active. Six coins at the cashier — BTC, ETH, USDT, LTC, DOGE and TON — and a 150% welcome bonus up to 1.5 BTC with 100 free spins across the first four deposits. The link is advertising, and Vave takes no part in the counts on this site.
Wild.io	Curaçao Gaming Authority	12	80	no amount published	45
Bitcasino.io	Curaçao Gaming Authority	not read	120	2,500 EUR	1
Rocketpot	Curacao	13	not read	US$2,500	34
Rainbet	Anjouan Gaming Board	9	33	no amount published	11
Wolf.bet	Government of the Autonomous Island of Anjouan, Union of Comoros	13	32	no amount published	48
DuckDice	Anjouan Gaming Board	10	19	no amount published	16
Flush	Anjouan Gaming Board	9	85	not read	list not read
Bitsler	Curaçao Gaming Authority	not read	41	no amount published	1
BitStarz	Curaçao Gaming Authority	not read	62	no amount published	74

The number that acts last

Read the sequence in the order it actually happens. A ball falls through a grid and lands in a slot, at a probability fixed by the row count and computable in advance — that is the odds page. The slot pays whatever the paytable says, and the largest of those numbers is the one every marketing page quotes — that is the multipliers page.

Then the balance sits in an account, and two clauses decide whether it can leave: the identity clause, and the withdrawal ceiling. The first is on the verification page. The second is this page.

Of the two, the ceiling is the one almost nobody looks up before depositing, and it is the one that turns a large result into a schedule.

The three published figures

Bitcasino.io, clause 6.10. 1,000,000 USDT per week.

Wild.io, clause 9.6. 100,000 USD per week.

Rocketpot, clause 11.5. 5,000 USD per month.

Set those side by side and the spread is the point. Per week, the highest is ten times the middle one. Against the lowest, converting to a common period, the highest is roughly two hundred times as much money over the same stretch of calendar. These are three operators of broadly similar profile, all appearing in the same table, and the clause that governs a large balance differs between them by a factor that no other column on this site comes close to.

That is why the ceiling deserves more attention than the multiplier. A ×1,000 result is a property of a board that any operator running the same studio game shares. A ceiling is a property of the specific company holding the money.

What a ceiling does to a balance, in arithmetic

The calculation is a division, and it is worth doing before rather than after.

Under a 5,000 USD monthly ceiling, a balance of 60,000 USD is a twelve-month schedule at the published rate. Under a 100,000 USD weekly ceiling, the same balance leaves in one week. Under a 1,000,000 USDT weekly ceiling, it is not a constraint at all.

A drawing of the meerkat tallykeeper holding a large valve wheel down at its side — Three ceilings are published: 1,000,000 USDT a week at Bitcasino.io clause 6.10, 100,000 USD a week at Wild.io clause 9.6, and 5,000 USD a month at Rocketpot clause 11.5. Under the last, a 60,000 USD balance is a twelve-month schedule; under the middle one it leaves in a week.

None of that is a prediction that a payout will arrive on any schedule. It is the ceiling the document publishes, and a published rate is a maximum rather than a promise: the identity clause sits above it in the order of operations, and a request for documents stops the clock regardless of what the ceiling says. Seven of the ten operators here publish an identity clause with no amount in it, meaning such a request can arrive at any size.

The seven that publish nothing readable

Vave, Rainbet, Wolf.bet, DuckDice, Flush, Bitsler and BitStarz publish no withdrawal ceiling that was read. Their cells are empty, and the empty cell means one of two things: the terms were read and contain no such figure, or the point was not reached.

It does not mean unlimited. Across the hundred operator records behind this network, 14 publish a withdrawal cap at all, so most of this market publishes nothing on the subject — and a market that mostly says nothing is not a market that has mostly agreed to no limits.

This is the same reading rule that governs every blank on the site, and the reason it is stated on every page that has blanks is that it has cost real money elsewhere: a figure invented to fill an empty cell propagates across pages faster than the correction does. The rule is written out on the methodology page.

Ceilings, licences and where a dispute would go

A ceiling is enforced by whoever the operator answers to, which is why the licence column belongs next to it. All ten operators here publish a licence number: six under Curaçao and four under Anjouan. Wild.io and Bitcasino.io, two of the three that publish a ceiling, hold Curaçao numbers — OGL/2024/210/0198 and OGL/2023/111/0069 respectively — and Rocketpot publishes 1668/JAZ.

The full register detail sits in the table on the home page. What a licence does not tell you is which countries an operator excludes from its service, which is a separate list in a separate part of the terms and is set out on the countries page.

And none of it is affected by which board a balance came from. Nothing in these ten documents makes a payout term depend on the game, so a house-built board and a licensed studio board sit under identical clauses — the difference between the two origins is on the page about who builds the board.

Questions people type about the board

Which operators here publish a withdrawal ceiling?

Three. Bitcasino.io names 1,000,000 USDT a week in clause 6.10, Wild.io names 100,000 USD a week in clause 9.6, and Rocketpot names 5,000 USD a month in clause 11.5. Each figure carries a clause number so the copying can be checked at source.

What does an empty ceiling column mean?

That no ceiling was found in a document that was read, or that the document was not read. It never means unlimited. Across the hundred operator records behind this network, 14 publish a withdrawal cap of any kind, so the empty cell is the normal case rather than the exception.

How long would a large balance take to leave under a monthly ceiling?

Arithmetic anyone can do: a balance divided by the ceiling gives the number of periods. Against a 5,000 USD monthly ceiling, 60,000 USD takes twelve months at the published rate. Whether the account, the terms or the operator still exist at that point is not something reading establishes.

Does the ceiling relate to the maximum multiplier of a game?

Only in consequence. The multiplier decides how large a single result can be; the ceiling decides how much of it can move in a period. They come from two different documents written by two different parties, and no version of either is transferable between operators.