A list’s length is a fact about the document, not the market

Ten operators whose records carry a house-games category, with the fields their own documents and licence registers actually publish. Every figure here is about the account, not about the board: nothing in this data says which games any of them carries, and no cell has been filled in to suggest otherwise. Every empty cell on this table is a list nobody read, and it is never a zero: a blank under coins does not mean an operator takes none, and a blank under countries barred does not mean it bars none.

Operator	Licence	Coins listed	Studios listed	Amount before ID check	Countries barred	Go
Vaveour partner	Curaçao Gaming Authority · OGL/2024/1676/0905 · Active	6	Casino and sportsbook on one balance	Case by case, clause 8.7	Open to this site’s readers	Visit
Vave is the partner of this site, and the one operator here you can look up in a register in under a minute: licence OGL/2024/1676/0905, held by Latcas B.V., issued 19 May 2025 and active. Six coins at the cashier — BTC, ETH, USDT, LTC, DOGE and TON — and a 150% welcome bonus up to 1.5 BTC with 100 free spins across the first four deposits. The link is advertising, and Vave takes no part in the counts on this site.
Wild.io	Curaçao Gaming Authority	12	80	no amount published	45
Bitcasino.io	Curaçao Gaming Authority	not read	120	2,500 EUR	1
Rocketpot	Curacao	13	not read	US$2,500	34
Rainbet	Anjouan Gaming Board	9	33	no amount published	11
Wolf.bet	Government of the Autonomous Island of Anjouan, Union of Comoros	13	32	no amount published	48
DuckDice	Anjouan Gaming Board	10	19	no amount published	16
Flush	Anjouan Gaming Board	9	85	not read	list not read
Bitsler	Curaçao Gaming Authority	not read	41	no amount published	1
BitStarz	Curaçao Gaming Authority	not read	62	no amount published	74

Eight lists, and what counting them shows

Every operator that serves customers internationally keeps a list of places it does not serve. Eight of the ten here publish one that was read.

Between them the eight name 113 distinct countries. No country appears on all eight, which sounds surprising until the last two rows are read again: a list with one entry cannot share much with a list of seventy-four.

Five countries appear on six of the eight lists — Spain, France, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and the United States — and that is as close to a consensus as this data contains.

A length is a property of a page, not of a company

The gap between 74 and 1 is the most interesting number here, and the wrong way to read it is as a measure of how open an operator is.

A list is a document an operator writes about itself. It can be long because the operator maintains it carefully, or short because the operator publishes only the entries it considers most likely to be asked about. Two operators here publish exactly one country each, and treating those two as the most permissive names in the table would be reading a publishing habit as a policy.

That is the same caution this site applies to every counted field. Studio lists run from 19 to 120, and the reason is at least partly disclosure rather than lobby size — the detail is on the page about who builds the board. Coin lists run from 6 to 13 with a common core of four, on the coins page.

Two documents, and they answer to different people

The exclusion list is not the only document that names countries. The licence an operator works under names some as well, and the two are drafted by different parties for different reasons.

Standard Anjouan licence conditions name Austria, Germany, France, Spain and the Netherlands as prohibited jurisdictions, on the grounds that each runs a state monopoly or a national licensing regime of its own. Four operators in this table hold Anjouan licences: Rainbet, Wolf.bet, DuckDice and Flush.

Of those four, three publish an exclusion list that was read, and all three name all five of those countries. Rainbet's list of 11 includes them. Wolf.bet's 48 includes them. DuckDice's 16 includes them. Flush publishes no list that was read here, so nothing is claimed about it either way.

Where the two documents agree, there is nothing to flag. Where they would disagree, it matters, because a dispute is conducted with the licensing authority rather than with the operator's marketing page — and an operator can honestly omit a country from its own list while working under conditions that prohibit it.

The six Curaçao licensees

The other six operators — Vave, Wild.io, Bitcasino.io, Rocketpot, Bitsler and BitStarz — hold Curaçao numbers. Five of the six publish an exclusion list: 74 countries at BitStarz, 45 at Wild.io, 34 at Rocketpot, and a single entry each at Bitcasino.io and Bitsler.

Vave publishes no list that was read. Its cell says so, and the site prints nothing further about which countries it does or does not serve.

Every licence authority and number in the set is in the table on the home page.

What an exclusion list does not settle

It does not settle whether an account will open, because the list is one of several tests an operator applies, and the others are not published.

It does not settle what happens at the exit. That is decided by the identity clause — two operators here name an amount and seven name none, on the verification page — and by the withdrawal ceiling, of which three are published and they are two hundred times apart, on the withdrawal limits page.

And it has nothing to do with the game. The distribution of a board comes from its row count, which is arithmetic and identical everywhere, as set out on the odds page and on the page about the mechanism.

What this site will and will not print about a country, and why an unread list is never recorded as an empty one, is on the methodology page.