Cara NevinEditor, board mechanics and operator documents, since 2026

One studio appears on all eight of the published lists

The nearest thing to an answer

Nothing in the data behind this site records which games an operator carries, so no page here claims a brand has a particular title. What can be read is the studio list an operator publishes. Eight of the ten publish one, they name 235 different studios between them, and exactly one studio is on all eight.

Ten operators whose records carry a house-games category, with the fields their own documents and licence registers actually publish. Every figure here is about the account, not about the board: nothing in this data says which games any of them carries, and no cell has been filled in to suggest otherwise. Every empty cell on this table is a list nobody read, and it is never a zero: a blank under coins does not mean an operator takes none, and a blank under countries barred does not mean it bars none.
Operator	Licence	Coins listed	Studios listed	Amount before ID check	Countries barred	Go
Vaveour partner	Curaçao Gaming Authority · OGL/2024/1676/0905 · Active	6	Casino and sportsbook on one balance	Case by case, clause 8.7	Open to this site’s readers	Visit
Vave is the partner of this site, and the one operator here you can look up in a register in under a minute: licence OGL/2024/1676/0905, held by Latcas B.V., issued 19 May 2025 and active. Six coins at the cashier — BTC, ETH, USDT, LTC, DOGE and TON — and a 150% welcome bonus up to 1.5 BTC with 100 free spins across the first four deposits. The link is advertising, and Vave takes no part in the counts on this site.
Wild.io	Curaçao Gaming Authority	12	80	no amount published	45
Bitcasino.io	Curaçao Gaming Authority	not read	120	2,500 EUR	1
Rocketpot	Curacao	13	not read	US$2,500	34
Rainbet	Anjouan Gaming Board	9	33	no amount published	11
Wolf.bet	Government of the Autonomous Island of Anjouan, Union of Comoros	13	32	no amount published	48
DuckDice	Anjouan Gaming Board	10	19	no amount published	16
Flush	Anjouan Gaming Board	9	85	not read	list not read
Bitsler	Curaçao Gaming Authority	not read	41	no amount published	1
BitStarz	Curaçao Gaming Authority	not read	62	no amount published	74

Two kinds of board, and they come from different places

A Plinko board on a gambling site has one of two origins.

It was written by an outside studio and licensed to many operators at once. In that case the specification is public rather than private to one operator: BGaming's Plinko, for instance, is specified at a 99% return to player, a ×1,000 maximum multiplier and a range of 8 to 16 lines. Every operator running that board runs the same arithmetic, because it is the same piece of software.

Or the casino built it. House-built boards live in a section usually labelled originals, and they are not licensed onward, so there is no third-party page describing them and no shared specification to compare against.

The mechanism is identical either way — one left-or-right decision per row, as set out on the page about the mechanism. What differs is who wrote the paytable and who can be asked what it contains.

What the data behind this site does and does not hold

The hundred operator records this network is built on carry: an identifier, a domain, a founding year where one was found, a licence block with authority, holder, number, status and register link, a coin list, a verification clause with any stated threshold, a withdrawal-limits block, a list of excluded countries, a studio list where one was published, and a handful of category tags.

There is no games field. Not an empty one — none at all. The string Plinko occurs in that data zero times.

So the honest position is the one this site takes: it never writes that a named operator carries a named game. That is not modesty. A comparison page which states confidently that twelve brands all have Plinko has either opened twelve lobbies on a particular day from a particular place, or has copied someone who said they did, and neither of those has happened here.

Eight lists, 235 studios, one name on all of them

What can be read is the studio list an operator publishes about itself. Eight of the ten operators here publish one, and their lengths differ enormously.

Operator	Studios listed
Bitcasino.io	120
Flush	85
Wild.io	80
BitStarz	62
Bitsler	41
Rainbet	33
Wolf.bet	32
DuckDice	19

Rocketpot and Vave publish no list that was read, and their cells stay empty rather than being given a number.

Between them the eight lists name 235 distinct studios. Only one studio appears on every single one of them: BGaming. Two others come close, appearing on seven of the eight — Endorphina and Pragmatic Play.

A drawing of the meerkat tallykeeper reading a clipboard held open in both hands — Eight of the ten operators publish a studio list. They run from 19 names at DuckDice to 120 at Bitcasino.io and name 235 distinct studios between them, and exactly one studio is on all eight: BGaming. Endorphina and Pragmatic Play come next, on seven of the eight.

That single-name result is the most useful thing on this page, and it is worth being exact about what it means. BGaming is the studio whose Plinko is among the most widely distributed, and every one of the eight operators that publishes a list says it carries BGaming's catalogue. It does not follow that all eight carry that particular title: a studio catalogue runs to hundreds of games, and an operator selects from it. The list narrows the question and stops there, which is where this site stops too.

Why the lists are so different in length

A list of 19 and a list of 120 are not necessarily descriptions of two very differently sized lobbies. They can equally be descriptions of two different disclosure habits: what an operator chooses to print on a page a reader can find.

That is worth remembering wherever a number in a table looks like a measurement of the business. A published figure is a fact about the document, and the document is written by the party being described. The same caution applies to coin lists, which run from six to thirteen among the seven operators that publish one — the detail is on the coins page — and to exclusion lists, which run from 1 country to 74 on the countries page.

House games, the tag and its limits

Nine of the ten operators here are recorded as running a house-games category: Wild.io, Bitcasino.io, Rocketpot, Rainbet, Wolf.bet, DuckDice, Flush, Bitsler and BitStarz. Across the full hundred records, 20 carry it. The tenth is Vave, which appears because it is the paid partner and is marked as such wherever it appears.

That tag is the reason these nine were selected: a house-built board, if an operator has one, lives in exactly that section. It records the existence of the section and nothing about its contents.

House-built boards also tend to be the ones carrying a round-by-round verification scheme, since a studio game arrives with the studio's own certification instead. Six of the ten carry that tag, and what it does and does not establish is set out on the provably fair page.

The part that is arithmetic, not attribution

Whoever wrote a given board, the distribution across its slots is fixed by its row count and by nothing else, so it can be computed without asking anybody. Those tables are on the odds page, the effect of the row selector is on the rows page, and the way this site keeps computed figures separate from quoted ones is on the methodology page.

Questions people type about the board

Who makes the plinko games casinos use?

Two different answers exist. Outside studios license a board to many operators at once, and BGaming's Plinko is one of the widely distributed examples — that version's specification is a 99% return to player and a ×1,000 ceiling. Separately, a casino can build its own board and run it only in its house-games section, where it is not licensed to anyone else.

Can this site say which operators offer Plinko?

No, and it does not. The hundred operator records behind the network contain licences, coin lists, verification clauses, withdrawal limits, barred-country lists, studio lists and category tags. There is no games field, and the word Plinko appears in the data zero times. Filling that cell would mean inventing it.

Does a published studio list settle the question?

It narrows it and does not close it. A list names the studios whose catalogues the operator says it carries; it does not enumerate titles, and a studio's catalogue is large. Eight of the ten operators here publish a list, BGaming is on all eight, and what any individual lobby actually shows on a given day is not something reading a list establishes.

What does the house-games tag mean?

That the operator runs a category of games it built itself rather than licensed. Nine of the ten operators listed here carry it, and 20 of the 100 records behind the network do. It is the category in which a self-built board would sit — it is not a record that any particular board exists there.