Three kinds of number, kept apart on purpose

Ten operators whose records carry a house-games category, with the fields their own documents and licence registers actually publish. Every figure here is about the account, not about the board: nothing in this data says which games any of them carries, and no cell has been filled in to suggest otherwise. Every empty cell on this table is a list nobody read, and it is never a zero: a blank under coins does not mean an operator takes none, and a blank under countries barred does not mean it bars none.

Operator	Licence	Coins listed	Studios listed	Amount before ID check	Countries barred	Go
Vaveour partner	Curaçao Gaming Authority · OGL/2024/1676/0905 · Active	6	Casino and sportsbook on one balance	Case by case, clause 8.7	Open to this site’s readers	Visit
Vave is the partner of this site, and the one operator here you can look up in a register in under a minute: licence OGL/2024/1676/0905, held by Latcas B.V., issued 19 May 2025 and active. Six coins at the cashier — BTC, ETH, USDT, LTC, DOGE and TON — and a 150% welcome bonus up to 1.5 BTC with 100 free spins across the first four deposits. The link is advertising, and Vave takes no part in the counts on this site.
Wild.io	Curaçao Gaming Authority	12	80	no amount published	45
Bitcasino.io	Curaçao Gaming Authority	not read	120	2,500 EUR	1
Rocketpot	Curacao	13	not read	US$2,500	34
Rainbet	Anjouan Gaming Board	9	33	no amount published	11
Wolf.bet	Government of the Autonomous Island of Anjouan, Union of Comoros	13	32	no amount published	48
DuckDice	Anjouan Gaming Board	10	19	no amount published	16
Flush	Anjouan Gaming Board	9	85	not read	list not read
Bitsler	Curaçao Gaming Authority	not read	41	no amount published	1
BitStarz	Curaçao Gaming Authority	not read	62	no amount published	74

Three kinds of number, and why they are never blended

Most pages about gambling contain one undifferentiated stream of figures. This one separates them into three, and the separation is the main methodological decision on the site.

Computed. Every probability, path count and slot share on this site was calculated here from a single fact — that the ball makes one independent left-or-right decision per row — and is printed in full rather than summarised. The complete tables for 8, 12 and 16 rows are on the odds page, and the derivation is on the page about the mechanism. These numbers need no source. If a reader disputes one, a calculator settles it.

Quoted. Figures about a specific piece of software — a return to player, a maximum multiplier, a range of row counts — cannot be computed and are not guessed. They belong to one named version and are printed as that version's specification. Where this site names 99% return to player and a ×1,000 ceiling, the figures are the published specification of BGaming's Plinko; this reading has not opened the studio's own page, and does not claim to have. No such figure is transferred from one version of the game to another, because two boards with different paytables are two different games.

Read from a document. Everything about operators — licence authority and number, coin list, verification clause, withdrawal ceiling, exclusion list, studio list — comes from the operator's own terms or from a licence register entry, and carries the clause number or register reference behind it. The clause number is not decoration. It is the instruction for checking the copying.

The three states of a cell

A table cell on this site is in one of three states, and collapsing any two of them would be the fastest way to make the site untrue.

A figure with a clause. The operator published it and it was read. Bitcasino.io's 2,500 EUR at clause 6.6 and Rocketpot's 2,500 USD at clause 11.4 are the two on this site, and both are set out on the verification page.

Published, but with no figure in it. Seven operators here publish a verification clause that names no amount at all. That is a real disclosure and the opposite of a gap: it means a request can arrive at any size. The table words it as such rather than leaving it blank.

Not read. Somebody did not open the document, or opened it and did not find the point. Flush's verification clause is in this state, and so is Vave's exclusion list. The cell says not read, and nothing is claimed.

An empty cell is never a zero. A coin column showing nothing does not mean an operator takes no coins; an empty ceiling does not mean unlimited; an unread exclusion list does not mean nobody is excluded. Those are the three false readings that a badly built comparison table produces automatically, and avoiding them is most of the work.

What is deliberately absent from this site

Which operator carries which game. There is no field for it in the data and none has been invented. The nearest readable fact is the studio list an operator publishes, which eight of the ten do, and that is what gets printed — on the page about who builds the board.

Any recommendation about settings. No row count and no risk level is called better anywhere here. There is nothing in the arithmetic that would support such a sentence: the row selector changes the shape of the distribution, on the rows page, and the risk control changes the paytable, on the risk levels page. Neither is a lever on the margin.

Bonus figures. The operator data holds no bonus field that could be read, so any promotional amount printed here would have to come from marketing copy. None is printed.

Payout timings and support quality. Nobody here has an account, so nothing about how an operator behaves in practice can be established by this site, and nothing about it is claimed.

What the underlying data actually covers

The hundred operator records this network is built on are unevenly filled, and the honest way to present a table is to say by how much. A licence number is recorded for 68 of the 100. A coin list for 30. A withdrawal ceiling for 14. A verification threshold for 5.

The ten operators in this table are better covered than that, which is a consequence of how they were chosen rather than a finding about the market: all ten publish a licence number, seven publish a coin list, eight publish an exclusion list, eight publish a studio list, three publish a ceiling and two publish a verification figure.

The selection rule itself was fixed before the fields were looked at. Nine of the ten carry a house-games category — the section a self-built board would live in — and were read live rather than from an archive. The tenth is Vave, which is here because it pays to be.

The paid link

Vave is the advertising partner of this site. Its link is marked as paid placement wherever it appears, and that is the only reason it is in the table.

It is scored on nothing, because this site scores nothing. It takes part in no count: where a page says two operators publish a figure or eight publish a list, Vave is inside that arithmetic on exactly the same terms as everyone else, and where it publishes less than the others the table shows the gap rather than closing it. No studio list of Vave's and no exclusion list of Vave's was read, so both of those cells stand empty in the top row; its clause 8.7 reserves identity documents to its own discretion without naming an amount, and the table says that rather than a number.

Who applies these rules, and what they are not able to establish, is on the about page. The table itself, with every operator row, is on the home page, and the country lists behind one of its columns are on the countries page.